Pantagraph.com Weather forecast, local radar and more
Free TimeMonday, October 13, 2008 3:09 PM CDT
Stone shows surprising restraint with Bush pic 'W'
Advertisement

LOS ANGELES -- Oliver Stone thinks George W. Bush was unqualified to be president. However, the filmmaker found him an irresistible figure for drama.

After months of speculation over whether Stone's film biography would be a hatchet job on Bush, "W." arrives as a surprisingly empathetic — though hardly sympathetic — portrait of the president.

Stone, the historical revisionist behind the presidential sagas "JFK" and "Nixon," this time plays the provocateur by not doing what's expected of him, namely, putting Bush on a pillory.

"W." does present Bush as a man unfit to lead. And while Stone cannot resist injecting that theme with moments of sharp satire, he generally casts the president as a deeply tragic figure in far over his head, whose personal demons hold consequences for everyone else on the planet.

``I don't know who George Bush is, really. But I can tell you, it feels like him from everything we read, and we did a lot of reading,'' Stone said in an interview. ``The guy has good, bad and ugly qualities like everyone else, but I can understand that things can get out of balance if you have the power. Certain people, if they have the say-so, can really exert their uglier side, and that is what came out, I think.''

Played by Josh Brolin, Bush is presented as the black sheep of a political dynasty who surprised his own family by becoming the prodigal son that made good.

``W.,'' in theaters Friday, follows Bush from his boozy frat-boy days at Yale through a string of failed jobs and business enterprises and an early unsuccessful stab at politics. Perpetually in the shadow of his disapproving father, the first President Bush (James Cromwell), he eventually finds two anchors, wife Laura (Elizabeth Banks) and his born-again Christian faith.

Bush gives up drinking, though not his taste for beer. He's seen throughout his later years tipping back a bottle of nonalcoholic O'Doul's.

The film focuses on Bush's private life, a loving relationship with Laura, a competitive edge with brother Jeb, a contentious air with his father and mother (Ellen Burstyn).

Stone also crafts prolonged sequences recreating meetings at which Bush and his advisers shaped their war-on-terror policies after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Bush and company bat about language to come up with their ``axis of evil'' trademark for terrorist states. They backpedal to justify the invasion of Iraq after intelligence on weapons of mass destruction proves false. Vice President Dick Cheney (Richard Dreyfuss) delivers a chilling monologue about the aims of American imperialism.

The key actors on ``W.'' share Stone's liberal leanings and came to the film already convinced Bush was a bad president. They came away from it not necessarily thinking he was a bad man.

``Everybody will be surprised in one way or another, no matter how differently you see it. It's a very human depiction of this guy's life,'' Brolin said. ``It's an interesting, very behaviorally intense, somewhat funny, somewhat satirical, somewhat sardonic story about how this flailing guy became the president of the United States. Twice. ...

``I strangely found a lot of respect for the guy in his ability to tackle his demons. The opposite side of that is him feeling maybe that his demons were exorcised, when indeed they just came out in a different form through his presidency. The opportunities he saw that may have manifested through those, war being one of them.''

While Bush talks of being called by God to run for president in "W.," Stone speaks of the movie as destined to be made.

He and screenwriter Stanley Weiser had been developing a Bush film biography throughout 2007, but Stone was planning to start production on ``Pinkville,'' a drama about the My Lai massacre that would have been the Vietnam veteran's fourth movie about that war.

``Pinkville'' fell through late last year, and Stone saw an opportunity to rush ``W.'' into production and have it out while Bush was still in office.

``I think if we don't tell it now, no one cares for the next 20 years,'' co-star Banks said. ``Then maybe in 20 or 30 years we care again, when we're still sort of feeling the repercussions of this administration.''

Contractually, Stone could have delivered the finished film in time for the inauguration in January, but he wanted it in theaters before the election. He is cynical about its potential impact, however.

``I have no hopes. I cannot affect the dialogue. I did three Vietnam movies. Believe me, I'm humbled,'' Stone said. ``They did nothing to prevent the country from doing the same thing in the '90s in several incidents. And then above all, the `march to Iraq 2' was devastating to the psyche of responsible American veterans. Devastating. It really hurt us, hurt our soul.''

Stone later added that he hoped the film would prompt some reflection among Americans before they vote.

``Perhaps we can think about what we elected, who we elected these last eight years,'' Stone said. ``If they see the movie, they may think about who they voted for the last time and not forget it very conveniently. If they do that at least, that's pretty good. There's at least some thinking going on.

``Unless we excite the human brain, excite the human spirit, evolution will not occur. We'll become simpler and stupider, and we may revert to Stone Age behavior before long.''

Stone doesn't hold back on unflattering dramatic moments, showing a drunken Bush dancing on a bar or crashing a car into his parents' trash cans and nearly coming to blows with his father in the living room.

Such scenes are balanced with tender private times between Bush and his wife and moments of humility early in Bush's born-again conversion.

``Oliver Stone is ferociously intelligent. He is never going to give a one-sided look,'' said Thandie Newton, who plays Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser who later became secretary of state. ``It's not going for the jugular. Absolutely not, because that would be so easy. That would be lazy, lazy, lazy, lazy. This is about finding the person, and then leaving it open for an audience to judge.''

Many potential viewers may skip ``W.'' because they already have passed judgment on Bush, Dreyfuss said.

``Those few brave band of brothers who are still for Bush won't see it, and those many who are now against Bush don't have to see it,'' Dreyfuss said. ``I do believe that this film will be a knocked-out-of-the-ballpark winner overseas. I think every country on Earth wants to see this film, because every country on Earth has been wanting to hear Americans critique George Bush.''

Co-star Scott Glenn, who plays Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, marveled that such a film could even get made, no matter whether or not viewers agree with it.

``Even though we've fallen very far, it says I think some wonderful, central thing about this country,'' Glenn said. ``Where else could this have been done? In France? I don't think so, where they have a national board that reviews films. In Russia? Give me a break. How about Iran? A film about (Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad made by Iranians and released while he's still there? China? Do you really think so?

``I mean, where else could this happen? The fact that it's happened, regardless of whether you're on the right, the left or in between, just the fact it's happened I think is a cause for celebration.''


Take a look
Josh Brolin stars as George W. Bush in Oliver Stone's latest film, "W.," based on Bush's rise to the presidency.
Video
Most commented stories
Community calendar
Browse online archives
Recent issues:
Reader comments on this story - 16 total

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

SemiNormal wrote on Oct 14, 2008 12:14 PM:

" Proud Conservative:
Maybe because there is some truth to it? That said, I am sure this movie will be a pile of biased garbage. They might as well stick Micheal Moore in it. "

JimmyChooGirl wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:49 AM:

" albundy54 - Are you really dissing The Doors movie? *L* That movie was great and portrayed Morrison right on. Val Kilmer should have won an oscar. I find it hysterical that people can't seperate politics and entertainment, whether or not there is a clear political message - it's still a movie!

Crybabies - No one here has seen the movie, it's not out yet.

All you conservatives need to chill out. It's a movie, it's for entertainment. If you don't want to see it, don't. But if you have no interest why spend your precious time commenting about it? I think the movie looks great and Josh Brolin is a great actor. I hate Bush but I think this movie will actually make me feel sorry for him, this movie is going to humanize him and I didn't think that was possible! "

Admiral wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:29 AM:

" Yaaawwwwnnnnn.
Whatta surprise, Stone bashing conservatives. If you really want to see something thought-provoking (and entertaining) check out American Carol. No matter what side you're on, you can't help but chuckle all the way through it. My liberal wife nearly fell out of her seat several times in laughter. "

deanwormer wrote on Oct 14, 2008 10:01 AM:

" to prairie loon:  people are not garbage.  disagree all you want but don't belittle yourself with ignorant rantings such as your post.  comments like this tell all there is to know about the poster. "

The other Dave wrote on Oct 14, 2008 9:24 AM:

" Liberal, fact-less Propaganda. And all of the Barack OCarter kool-aid drinkers will be spending their government issued support checks to see it. "

Crybabies wrote on Oct 14, 2008 6:36 AM:

" I, unlike all the other poster/critics here, haven't seen this movie. Now, I won't have to. Many thanks to y'all for the glowing reviews. By the way, has anyone also not seen the extremely Reverend John Hagee's production of " The First Temptation of GB"? I think it's 'about' two hours. "

Prairie Loon wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:48 AM:

" Anything truthful said about Bush would sound like garbage because Bush has been garbage. 8 terrible years of garbage that began with Enron's manipulation of the power grid that caused such havoc in CA., which Bush wrote off as "free market forces at work". Now we know it was a payback for Ken Lay's support of Bush. Garbage in-garbage out. Soon to be garbage out. Praise the Lord! "

CrazyCooter68 wrote on Oct 14, 2008 3:58 AM:

" Gee, another Oliver Stone (opinion) film. WOW... I don't think so. "

mickeybaby wrote on Oct 14, 2008 3:07 AM:

" C'mon, y'all. I'm a staunch republican but believe W is a dolt. "

Proud Conservative wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:44 PM:

" We've been reading non-stop criticism and liberal garbage about this guy for 8 years. Why spend $10 to have some Hollywood nutjob tell you he thinks Bush is an idiot when you can read this garbage every day in the newspaper or see it on CNN/MSNBC/CBS/ABC/NBC? "

floyd wrote on Oct 13, 2008 8:48 PM:

" Hollyweed is running out of redo's. Pretty soon you'll be seeing Kink Kong redo number 24 and Rocky 98. They have no creativity anymore. Like bundy said if it weren't for comic books thrre wouldn't be any movies anymore. "

jdl wrote on Oct 13, 2008 8:22 PM:

" Who keeps funding this crap in Hollywood? They couldn't even get someone remotely like GW to play the part. What a waste of time and money. If they want to throw money away I can come up with a couple story lines for a few million. "

110100100 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 8:17 PM:

" floyd - Even conservative republicans don't like Bush. The guy has the lowest approval rating in American history. "

Dirty Sanchez wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:32 PM:

" Blah, blah, blah. More useless political commentary from Hollywood and overpaid actors and screenwriters. Blah, blah, blah. Who needs objectivity when you have creative license (this refers to Mr. Stone in general, not to the movie W, which I haven't seen)?

Stay thirsty, my friends. "

albundy54 wrote on Oct 13, 2008 5:23 PM:

" I have said for years that Hollywood has ran out of ideas for films. The proof is that anymore the highest rated movies are about comic book characters who most were created pre World War II. I find this just another attempt on the part of Hollywood liberal hacks to take a shot at conservatives and what Oliver Stone did when he did the Jim Morrison story he proved then he was a big hack. Just more proof that Hollywood needs some new writers and scripts for movies. "

floyd wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:02 PM:

" It's hollyweed! That should explain just about everything. The conservative republican haters. "

Add your own comments

Please read the rules before posting comments.

You must be logged in to leave comments.
If you don't have a member ID, please register.

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?